Review



ev a71  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    ATCC ev a71
    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected <t>with</t> <t>EV-A71</t> (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
    Ev A71, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 75 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ev a71/product/ATCC
    Average 94 stars, based on 75 article reviews
    ev a71 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Salt-inducible kinase 1 is a key gene in suppressing EVD68-induced asthma by modulating antiviral immunity"

    Article Title: Salt-inducible kinase 1 is a key gene in suppressing EVD68-induced asthma by modulating antiviral immunity

    Journal: Genes & Diseases

    doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101845

    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected with EV-A71 (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected with EV-A71 (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.

    Techniques Used: Infection, Reverse Transcription, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Standard Deviation, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Immunofluorescence, Microscopy, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Plaque Assay



    Similar Products

    ev a71  (ATCC)
    94
    ATCC ev a71
    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected <t>with</t> <t>EV-A71</t> (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
    Ev A71, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ev a71/product/ATCC
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ev a71 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC enterovirus a71 ev a71 strain h
    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected <t>with</t> <t>EV-A71</t> (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
    Enterovirus A71 Ev A71 Strain H, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/enterovirus a71 ev a71 strain h/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    enterovirus a71 ev a71 strain h - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    ATCC 1825 ev a71 isolate brcr atcc cat
    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected <t>with</t> <t>EV-A71</t> (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
    1825 Ev A71 Isolate Brcr Atcc Cat, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/1825 ev a71 isolate brcr atcc cat/product/ATCC
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    1825 ev a71 isolate brcr atcc cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    ATCC ev a71 brcr
    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected <t>with</t> <t>EV-A71</t> (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
    Ev A71 Brcr, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ev a71 brcr/product/ATCC
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ev a71 brcr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC ev a71 strain h vr 1432
    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected <t>with</t> <t>EV-A71</t> (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
    Ev A71 Strain H Vr 1432, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ev a71 strain h vr 1432/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ev a71 strain h vr 1432 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    ATCC ev a71 strain h
    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected <t>with</t> <t>EV-A71</t> (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
    Ev A71 Strain H, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ev a71 strain h/product/ATCC
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ev a71 strain h - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected with EV-A71 (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.

    Journal: Genes & Diseases

    Article Title: Salt-inducible kinase 1 is a key gene in suppressing EVD68-induced asthma by modulating antiviral immunity

    doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101845

    Figure Lengend Snippet: SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected with EV-A71 (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.

    Article Snippet: The EV-D68 (ATCC VR-1826), EV-A71, HSV-1, and VSV-GFP were kept in our laboratory.

    Techniques: Infection, Reverse Transcription, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Standard Deviation, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Immunofluorescence, Microscopy, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Plaque Assay